African Burial Ground
Home
Events
Press
Commissioned Artwork
Memorial
Interpretive Center
OPEI
Reinterment
Reports
Other References
Milestones
Milestones
 

Activity Report
African Burial Ground Project

Pursuant to the Amended Memorandum of Agreement

October 31, 2003

This report covers events surrounding the African Burial Ground (ABG) Project for the period of August 2003 through October 2003.

Introduction

The activities for this reporting period include the weeklong events associated with the Rites of Ancestral Return reinterment ceremonies, as well as the ongoing activities to complete the technical reports and the continuing coordination regarding the Exterior Memorial and Interpretive Center for the site. A brief list of meetings, telephone conversations, etc., held during this reporting period is provided as Appendix A.

 

Activities of the Reporting Period

Rites of Ancestral Return Reinterment Ceremonies
(Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture)

The Rites of Ancestral Return commenced on September 30, 2003, with a tribute ceremony at the Andrew Rankin Memorial Chapel at Howard University. The four individuals representing all of the deceased were then taken to Baltimore, Wilmington, Philadelphia and Newark on October 1st and 2nd for tributes in each community. On Friday, October 3, 2003, the four coffins were taken by flotilla from Jersey City to Wall Street, where, after a brief ceremony, they joined a procession of five horse-drawn wagons carrying the remaining coffins up Broadway to the memorial site at Duane Street. The wagons were escorted by members of a number of diverse community organizations, who, acting as pallbearers, transferred the coffins from the wagons to the crypts. After the coffins were placed into the crypts, a viewing and vigil commenced to allow members of the public an opportunity to pay their respects. On the following day, October 4, 2003, an internationally attended, public tribute was held to conclude the Rites of Ancestral Return ceremonies with the lowering of the seven wooden crypts containing the human remains and associated artifacts of 419 individuals.
 
 
Technical Studies (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Howard University)

The Howard University team has continued its preparation of the history and skeletal biology draft reports, the completion of the archaeological analysis, and the preparation of the archaeology report.

To date the History Team, under the direction of Dr. Edna Medford, has submitted a second draft history report, which has been reviewed by the History Advisory Review Board. This draft report was also submitted to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, and National Park Service (NPS) for their review. The review agencies provided comments, which were submitted to Howard University.

The Skeletal Biology team, under the direction of Dr. Michael Blakey, has submitted a second draft skeletal biology report, which has been reviewed by Skeletal Biology Advisory Review Board. This draft report was also submitted to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, and National Park Service for their review. The review agencies provided comments, which were submitted to Howard University.

The Archaeology Team, under the direction of Drs. Warren Perry and Jean Howson, have begun writing the archaeology report. Ceramic specialist Dr. Meta Janowitz has continued the identification and classification of the stoneware sherds. Based upon the results of the various public forums and in consultation with the project archaeologists, GSA determined that the burial artifacts – those items found within the burial in association with the individual – as well as coffin hardware, including nails and tacks, wood coffin fragments and any other material that was directly associated with the individual burials would be reintered as part of the reburial ceremonies. Artifacts, primarily the stonewares found in the fill on the site, which were not associated with the burial of the individuals, would not be reintered.

Dr. Howson and archaeologists from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) also re-inventoried all of the coffin hardware, coffin fragments, soil samples and all other burial-related artifacts that were recovered in association with the human remains and had been stored in the laboratory at the Bowling Green Customs House. This activity involved comparing the artifacts present to the inventory developed by Drs. Howson and Perry to ensure all burial artifacts are accounted for prior to reburial. Also at this, time all of the burial artifacts were gathered together for placement in the corresponding coffins.

From 17 September through 24 September 2003, the Bronx Council on the Arts working with the Corps placed all of the burial artifacts, coffin hardware, and coffin fragments into the corresponding coffins. The exterior of each coffin was also photographed to document the various symbols and scenes carved on each one. The soil samples, as well as the stones that may have been grave markers, were placed in 290 Broadway for placement on top of the crypts. As part of the ceremony, mourners placed some of this soil on top of the crypts once the crypts had been lowered into the ground. A few days after the reinterment, the remainder of the soil samples was replaced on top of the crypts.
 
 
Replication of Burial Artifacts (NPS)

In September 2003, GSA contracted with the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation for the replication of a number of burial objects, including buttons, rings, and straight pins. A total of 31 individual artifacts will be replicated. The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation made molds of the artifacts and documented the each artifact with digital photographs. The artifacts were returned to New York City prior to reburial and placed within their corresponding coffins by the Bronx Council on the Arts.

For the other artifacts that were not replicated, additional photographs were taken to allow for replication in the future, if necessary. For a number of artifact types, such as beads and coins, it is possible to purchase mass-produced copies, or in the case of coins, actual originals for use in the interpretive center.
 
 
Archives Project (U.S. Army Corp of Engineers)

During this quarter, the archival team has conducted three field visits to locate, identify and assess project documentation. The remaining two field visits will be conducted in the next few months. The feasibility study, the condition assessment and the field catalog have been drafted and are undergoing review.
 
 
Interpretive Center and Exterior Memorial (National Park Service)

On September 22, 2003, GSA and NPS signed a formal inter-agency agreement that will allow the NPS to work with GSA and the community on the development of the Exterior Memorial and Interpretive Center. The NPS has begun preparation of the Support Agreements that define the Scope of Work for each project in consultation with GSA and other interested parties.

 
 

Consultation

Meeting with Regulatory Agencies, 26 Federal Plaza, 26 August 2003

On 26 August 2003, Karl Reichelt, Regional Administrator, GSA, met with representatives from the regulatory agencies providing oversight to the project regarding the status of the research and coordination with the public prior to reinterment. In attendance were:

General Services Administration
Karl Reichelt
Steve Ruggiero
John Scorcia
Mark Dremel
Cassandra Henderson
David Anthone
Michael Scroggins
Tracy Childs
Edna Clark
Joan Brierton
 
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Charlene Vaughn
Laura Dean
 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Michael K. Trimble
Nancy Brighton 
 
National Park Service
James Pepper
Lloyd Chapman
 
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Amanda Sutphin
Mark Silberman
 
New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Robert Kuhn
 
Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture
Howard Dodson
Roberta Yancy
 
The purpose of the meeting was to determine the status of the different components of the project (scientific reports, reinterment, exterior memorial, interpretive center, etc.), to determine if the activities were being completed in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that would permit reinterment to proceed and to provide a basis for the discussion at the consulting party meeting that was scheduled for the same evening. Discussion focused on the partnership between the NPS and GSA regarding the development of the Exterior Memorial and the Interpretive Center. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) requested that the NPS and GSA look not only to provide the community with information but work to involve community directly in the planning. In addition, the ACHP requested an update on the curation of documents and the preparation of the technical reports. The ACHP wants to ensure that the documentation regarding the project and the research conducted will be made accessible to the public, particularly to allow for community access – not just scholars or researchers but anyone. The ACHP, supported by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (NYC LPC), would like to see all the material associated with the project curated in New York City.
 
 
Consulting Party Meeting, Adam Clayton Powell Building, August 26, 2003

Charlene Vaughn, ACHP, opened the meeting with a brief review of the project, including an explanation of what GSA agreed to do as part of the MOA. Ms. Vaughn concluded that the goal of consulting party meeting would be to better ensure community comments and concerns are incorporated into the various activities being conducted to fulfill the MOA. Various members of the community spoke and indicated that GSA should work to involve the community directly not just solicit input. A number of people indicated that the October reinterment date was unacceptable as were proposed elements of the ceremony. In addition, many were angry with GSA for not being consulted regarding activities that are being proposed as part of the ceremony. There was some discussion among the community members concerning the religious groups or emphasis included in the ceremony activities. Others felt that GSA should not be involved in any exterior memorial or interpretive center or other activities regarding the burial ground. Ms. Vaughn explained that legally GSA must fund these and other components of the MOA, but that GSA could work with other agencies, such as the NPS, to take the lead on carrying out these activities.
 
 
Meeting with Regulatory Agencies and Project Partners/Team
New York City, 26 Federal Plaza

On 30 October 2003, Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, GSA, met with representatives from the regulatory agencies providing oversight to the project regarding the status of the research and coordination with representatives from the community. In attendance were:
   
General Services Administration
Stephen A. Perry
Karl Reichelt
Steve Ruggiero
John Scorcia
Lionel Batley
Carol Latterman
Cassandra Henderson
Peter Sneed
Mark Dremel
Mildred Broughton
Rolando Rivas-Camp
David Anthone
Joan Brierton

National Park Service
James Pepper

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Michael Trimble
Nancy Brighton
 
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Laura Dean
Charlene Vaughn

New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Robert Kuhn

New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Robert Tierney
Amanda Sutphin

Howard University
O. Jackson Cole
James Donaldson

Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture
Roberta Yancy
Christopher Moore
 
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of the technical reports, the curation of the samples and documentary material, the interpretive center and the exterior memorial. Mr. Perry opened the meeting by assuring the participants that GSA was committed to completing the remaining components of the project, including the creation of an interpretive center at 290 Broadway. The Corps and Howard University indicated that two drafts of the reports had been submitted and reviewed by the History and Skeletal Biology Advisory Review Boards. In addition, the most recent draft had been sent to the regulatory agencies for their review and comment. Howard University indicated that they had revised the reports based upon all comments received and produced a third draft that has also been reviewed by the Advisory Review Boards. The Corps and Howard University will be meeting in November to update the current report schedule and develop a plan to negotiate a contract for the integrated report, the public report, and the final printing of all of the reports. In addition, the Corps is working with Howard University to inventory all of the samples (DNA, bone chemistry, etc.) currently with researchers and to bring them to Howard University for short-term curation until a permanent facility and plan to allow access for future research is developed. By the end of July 2004, all of the samples will be brought to Howard University for initial curation. The Corps is also working with Howard University and GSA to identify and catalog all of the original documents for curation in a facility in New York City for future research. In addition to this material, the artifacts, primarily the stoneware sherds found in the fill, will require curation. The Advisory Council reiterated their concern with ensuring the curation of the samples and all items in one place as well as being to develop a plan that will allow future research. The NPS presented an outline of the activities to be completed to work with the community, GSA and Howard University to tell the story of the burial ground. The NPS is committed to taking the results of the public discussions and bringing them into the development and planning of the exterior memorial and the interpretive center.

Meeting with Community Representatives, 26 Federal Plaza, New York City, 30 October 2003
 
General Services Administration
Stephen Perry
Karl Reichelt
Steve Ruggiero
John Scorcia
Cassandra Henderson
Mark Dremel
Mildred Broughton
Rolando Rivas-Camp
David Anthone
Joan Brierton

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Michael Trimble
Nancy Brighton

National Park Service
James Pepper
 
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Laura Dean

New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Amanda Sutphin

Community Representatives
Ayo Harrington
Queen Mother Delois Blakely
Minister Clemson Brown
Eloise Dicks
Miriam Francis
Ollie McClean
Juanita Thomas
 
Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, GSA, opened the meeting by inviting the NPS and the Corps to provide a brief update on the progress of the Howard University research and the NPS activities for the Exterior Memorial and the Interpretive Center. Mr. Perry opened the meeting by assuring the participants that GSA was committed to completing the remaining components of the project, including the creation of an interpretive center at 290 Broadway. Members of their community expressed their anger that GSA was not involving them in the process. The community representatives outlined several issues: a museum should be built, not an “interpretive center”, based upon the recommendations of the Federal Steering Committee report; nothing should be built on the burial ground site, including the memorials represented by the conceptual designs already prepared; it had been the understanding of the members of the Federal Steering Committee, several of whom were in attendance at the meeting, that the Committee’s report was to have been carried out by GSA in addition to the terms of the MOA.

Mr. Perry indicated that GSA was not authorized to construct a museum and that such authorization had to come from Congress who would also appropriate the funds necessary. Ms. Dean stated that the requirement for an interpretive center was in the MOA. GSA and the NPS are proceeding with plans to develop an interpretive center to interpret the African Burial Ground. An interpretive center is within the scope and authority of GSA and Mr. Perry encouraged the public to participate in the NPS’s listening sessions and meetings that will shape the outcome of how the site will be interpreted by visitors. Members of the community are welcome to pursue the concept of a memorial museum by petitioning their elected representatives in government at the federal, stat and city levels.

The Federal Steering Committee report recommended that a memorial be commissioned to commemorate the heritage of all Africans in America, and, in particular, those individuals buried at the African Burial Ground. The amended MOA states that GSA, in consulation with the City and the NYC LPC, shall determine an appropriate on-site memorial to commemorate the African Burial Ground. GSA and the NPS are proceededing with plans to construct a memorial on the African Burial Ground Memorial Site and members of the community are welcome to participate in the meeting the NPS will be holding regarding the memorial.

The NPS, in outlining its role in the development of the exterior memorial and interpretive center, stated that it would be looking to the community for help in defining the significance of the site and telling the site’s story.
 
 

GSA Public Forums

Public Forum – August 13, 2003

The public forum was held at Hunter College, and consisted of presentations by Christopher Moore, Schomburg Center, regarding the history of enslaved Africans in New York City. Mark Dremel, Project Manager, GSA, made a brief presentation regarding the reburial of artifacts. Mr. Dremel made reference to and summarized the previous discussions of the artifacts presented by Dr. Jean Howson and Dr. Warren Perry regarding the types of artifacts recovered. Based on these discussions and the archaeological research, all of the artifacts that were found in direct association with each burial, such as buttons, beads, straight pins, coins, coffin nails, and fragments of coffins, would be reburied with the individual. The artifacts recovered as part of the fill on the site, primarily fragments of the pottery produced at the potteries that had been in operation along Broadway, would not be reburied with the individuals. Mr. Dremel’s presentation was followed by an opportunity for the members of the audience to ask questions of GSA, Mr. Moore or the moderator, Diane Dayson, NPS.
 
 

Appendix A

Timeline of Meetings and Telephone Conferences conducted by
the ABG Project Team

 August – October 2003
 

August 12
 
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg Center/OPEI); New York City
 
August 13
 
Public Forum, Hunter College; New York City
August 26
 
Meeting between Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation, the National Park Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and GSA; New York City.

Consulting Party Meeting sponsored by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation; Adam Clayton Powell Building, New York City
 
August 28
 
Meeting between Stephen Perry, Administrator, GSA and
 
September 4
 
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg Center/OPEI);
New York City
 
September 9
 
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg Center/OPEI);
New York City
 
September 17
 
Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Advisory Council on Historic Preservation,
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation)
 
September 23
 
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg Center/OPEI);
New York City
 
October 16
 
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg Center/OPEI);
New York City
 
October 30
 
Meeting/Conference call with GSA, Corps, NPS, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, Schomburg Center, and Howard University; New York City

Meeting with GSA, Corps, NPS, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission and Community Representatives