|
| |
|
Activity
Report
African
Burial Ground Project
Pursuant to the Amended Memorandum of Agreement
October 31, 2003
This report covers events
surrounding the African Burial Ground (ABG) Project for the period of August
2003 through October 2003.
Introduction
The activities for this
reporting period include the weeklong events associated with the Rites of
Ancestral Return reinterment ceremonies, as well as the ongoing activities
to complete the technical reports and the continuing coordination regarding the
Exterior Memorial and Interpretive Center for the site. A brief list of
meetings, telephone conversations, etc., held during this reporting period is
provided as Appendix A.
Activities of the Reporting Period
Rites of Ancestral
Return Reinterment Ceremonies
(Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture)
The Rites of Ancestral Return commenced on September 30, 2003, with a tribute
ceremony at the Andrew Rankin Memorial Chapel at Howard University. The four
individuals representing all of the deceased were then taken to Baltimore,
Wilmington, Philadelphia and Newark on October 1st and 2nd for tributes in each
community. On Friday, October 3, 2003, the four coffins were taken by flotilla
from Jersey City to Wall Street, where, after a brief ceremony, they joined a
procession of five horse-drawn wagons carrying the remaining coffins up Broadway
to the memorial site at Duane Street. The wagons were escorted by members of a
number of diverse community organizations, who, acting as pallbearers,
transferred the coffins from the wagons to the crypts. After the coffins were
placed into the crypts, a viewing and vigil commenced to allow members of the
public an opportunity to pay their respects. On the following day, October 4,
2003, an internationally attended, public tribute was held to conclude the Rites
of Ancestral Return ceremonies with the lowering of the seven wooden crypts
containing the human remains and associated artifacts of 419 individuals.
Technical Studies (U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers/Howard University)
The Howard University team has continued its preparation of the history and
skeletal biology draft reports, the completion of the archaeological analysis,
and the preparation of the archaeology report.
To date the History Team, under the direction of Dr. Edna Medford, has submitted
a second draft history report, which has been reviewed by the History Advisory
Review Board. This draft report was also submitted to the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York
State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, and National Park
Service (NPS) for their review. The review agencies provided comments, which
were submitted to Howard University.
The Skeletal Biology team, under the direction of Dr. Michael Blakey, has
submitted a second draft skeletal biology report, which has been reviewed by
Skeletal Biology Advisory Review Board. This draft report was also submitted to
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks
Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation, and National Park Service for their review. The review agencies
provided comments, which were submitted to Howard University.
The Archaeology Team, under the direction of Drs. Warren Perry and Jean Howson,
have begun writing the archaeology report. Ceramic specialist Dr. Meta Janowitz
has continued the identification and classification of the stoneware sherds.
Based upon the results of the various public forums and in consultation with the
project archaeologists, GSA determined that the burial artifacts – those items
found within the burial in association with the individual – as well as coffin
hardware, including nails and tacks, wood coffin fragments and any other
material that was directly associated with the individual burials would be
reintered as part of the reburial ceremonies. Artifacts, primarily the
stonewares found in the fill on the site, which were not associated with the
burial of the individuals, would not be reintered.
Dr. Howson and archaeologists from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) also
re-inventoried all of the coffin hardware, coffin fragments, soil samples and
all other burial-related artifacts that were recovered in association with the
human remains and had been stored in the laboratory at the Bowling Green Customs
House. This activity involved comparing the artifacts present to the inventory
developed by Drs. Howson and Perry to ensure all burial artifacts are accounted
for prior to reburial. Also at this, time all of the burial artifacts were
gathered together for placement in the corresponding coffins.
From 17 September through 24 September 2003, the Bronx Council on the Arts
working with the Corps placed all of the burial artifacts, coffin hardware, and
coffin fragments into the corresponding coffins. The exterior of each coffin was
also photographed to document the various symbols and scenes carved on each one.
The soil samples, as well as the stones that may have been grave markers, were
placed in 290 Broadway for placement on top of the crypts. As part of the
ceremony, mourners placed some of this soil on top of the crypts once the crypts
had been lowered into the ground. A few days after the reinterment, the
remainder of the soil samples was replaced on top of the crypts.
Replication of Burial Artifacts
(NPS)
In September 2003, GSA contracted with the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation for
the replication of a number of burial objects, including buttons, rings, and
straight pins. A total of 31 individual artifacts will be replicated. The
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation made molds of the artifacts and documented the
each artifact with digital photographs. The artifacts were returned to New York
City prior to reburial and placed within their corresponding coffins by the
Bronx Council on the Arts.
For the other artifacts that were not replicated, additional photographs were
taken to allow for replication in the future, if necessary. For a number of
artifact types, such as beads and coins, it is possible to purchase
mass-produced copies, or in the case of coins, actual originals for use in the
interpretive center.
Archives Project (U.S. Army Corp of
Engineers)
During this quarter, the archival team has conducted three field visits to
locate, identify and assess project documentation. The remaining two field
visits will be conducted in the next few months. The feasibility study, the
condition assessment and the field catalog have been drafted and are undergoing
review.
Interpretive Center and Exterior
Memorial (National Park Service)
On September 22, 2003, GSA and NPS signed a formal inter-agency agreement that
will allow the NPS to work with GSA and the community on the development of the
Exterior Memorial and Interpretive Center. The NPS has begun preparation of the
Support Agreements that define the Scope of Work for each project in
consultation with GSA and other interested parties.
Consultation
Meeting with Regulatory
Agencies, 26 Federal Plaza, 26 August 2003
On 26 August 2003, Karl Reichelt, Regional Administrator, GSA, met with
representatives from the regulatory agencies providing oversight to the project
regarding the status of the research and coordination with the public prior to
reinterment. In attendance were:
|
General Services Administration
Karl Reichelt
Steve Ruggiero
John Scorcia
Mark Dremel
Cassandra Henderson
David Anthone
Michael Scroggins
Tracy Childs
Edna Clark
Joan Brierton
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Charlene Vaughn
Laura Dean
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Michael K. Trimble
Nancy Brighton
|
National Park Service
James Pepper
Lloyd Chapman
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Amanda Sutphin
Mark Silberman
New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Robert Kuhn
Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture
Howard Dodson
Roberta Yancy
|
The purpose of the meeting was to determine the
status of the different components of the project (scientific reports,
reinterment, exterior memorial, interpretive center, etc.), to determine if the
activities were being completed in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) that would permit reinterment to proceed and to provide a basis for the
discussion at the consulting party meeting that was scheduled for the same
evening. Discussion focused on the partnership between the NPS and GSA regarding
the development of the Exterior Memorial and the Interpretive Center. The
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) requested that the NPS and GSA
look not only to provide the community with information but work to involve
community directly in the planning. In addition, the ACHP requested an update on
the curation of documents and the preparation of the technical reports. The ACHP
wants to ensure that the documentation regarding the project and the research
conducted will be made accessible to the public, particularly to allow for
community access – not just scholars or researchers but anyone. The ACHP,
supported by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (NYC LPC),
would like to see all the material associated with the project curated in New
York City.
Consulting Party Meeting, Adam
Clayton Powell Building, August 26, 2003
Charlene Vaughn, ACHP, opened the meeting with a brief review of the project,
including an explanation of what GSA agreed to do as part of the MOA. Ms. Vaughn
concluded that the goal of consulting party meeting would be to better ensure
community comments and concerns are incorporated into the various activities
being conducted to fulfill the MOA. Various members of the community spoke and
indicated that GSA should work to involve the community directly not just
solicit input. A number of people indicated that the October reinterment date
was unacceptable as were proposed elements of the ceremony. In addition, many
were angry with GSA for not being consulted regarding activities that are being
proposed as part of the ceremony. There was some discussion among the community
members concerning the religious groups or emphasis included in the ceremony
activities. Others felt that GSA should not be involved in any exterior memorial
or interpretive center or other activities regarding the burial ground. Ms.
Vaughn explained that legally GSA must fund these and other components of the
MOA, but that GSA could work with other agencies, such as the NPS, to take the
lead on carrying out these activities.
Meeting with Regulatory Agencies
and Project Partners/Team
New York City, 26 Federal Plaza
On 30 October 2003, Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, GSA, met with
representatives from the regulatory agencies providing oversight to the project
regarding the status of the research and coordination with representatives from
the community. In attendance were:
|
General Services Administration
Stephen A. Perry
Karl Reichelt
Steve Ruggiero
John Scorcia
Lionel Batley
Carol Latterman
Cassandra Henderson
Peter Sneed
Mark Dremel
Mildred Broughton
Rolando Rivas-Camp
David Anthone
Joan Brierton
National Park Service
James Pepper
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Michael Trimble
Nancy Brighton
|
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Laura Dean
Charlene Vaughn
New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Robert Kuhn
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Robert Tierney
Amanda Sutphin
Howard University
O. Jackson Cole
James Donaldson
Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture
Roberta Yancy
Christopher Moore
|
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status
of the technical reports, the curation of the samples and documentary material,
the interpretive center and the exterior memorial. Mr. Perry opened the meeting
by assuring the participants that GSA was committed to completing the remaining
components of the project, including the creation of an interpretive center at
290 Broadway. The Corps and Howard University indicated that two drafts of the
reports had been submitted and reviewed by the History and Skeletal Biology
Advisory Review Boards. In addition, the most recent draft had been sent to the
regulatory agencies for their review and comment. Howard University indicated
that they had revised the reports based upon all comments received and produced
a third draft that has also been reviewed by the Advisory Review Boards. The
Corps and Howard University will be meeting in November to update the current
report schedule and develop a plan to negotiate a contract for the integrated
report, the public report, and the final printing of all of the reports. In
addition, the Corps is working with Howard University to inventory all of the
samples (DNA, bone chemistry, etc.) currently with researchers and to bring them
to Howard University for short-term curation until a permanent facility and plan
to allow access for future research is developed. By the end of July 2004, all
of the samples will be brought to Howard University for initial curation. The
Corps is also working with Howard University and GSA to identify and catalog all
of the original documents for curation in a facility in New York City for future
research. In addition to this material, the artifacts, primarily the stoneware
sherds found in the fill, will require curation. The Advisory Council reiterated
their concern with ensuring the curation of the samples and all items in one
place as well as being to develop a plan that will allow future research. The
NPS presented an outline of the activities to be completed to work with the
community, GSA and Howard University to tell the story of the burial ground. The
NPS is committed to taking the results of the public discussions and bringing
them into the development and planning of the exterior memorial and the
interpretive center.
Meeting with Community
Representatives, 26 Federal Plaza, New York City, 30 October 2003
|
General Services Administration
Stephen Perry
Karl Reichelt
Steve Ruggiero
John Scorcia
Cassandra Henderson
Mark Dremel
Mildred Broughton
Rolando Rivas-Camp
David Anthone
Joan Brierton
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Michael Trimble
Nancy Brighton
National Park Service
James Pepper
|
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Laura Dean
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
Amanda Sutphin
Community Representatives
Ayo Harrington
Queen Mother Delois Blakely
Minister Clemson Brown
Eloise Dicks
Miriam Francis
Ollie McClean
Juanita Thomas
|
Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, GSA, opened the
meeting by inviting the NPS and the Corps to provide a brief update on the
progress of the Howard University research and the NPS activities for the
Exterior Memorial and the Interpretive Center. Mr. Perry opened the meeting by
assuring the participants that GSA was committed to completing the remaining
components of the project, including the creation of an interpretive center at
290 Broadway. Members of their community expressed their anger that GSA was not
involving them in the process. The community representatives outlined several
issues: a museum should be built, not an “interpretive center”, based upon the
recommendations of the Federal Steering Committee report; nothing should be
built on the burial ground site, including the memorials represented by the
conceptual designs already prepared; it had been the understanding of the
members of the Federal Steering Committee, several of whom were in attendance at
the meeting, that the Committee’s report was to have been carried out by GSA in
addition to the terms of the MOA.
Mr. Perry indicated that GSA was not authorized to construct a museum and that
such authorization had to come from Congress who would also appropriate the
funds necessary. Ms. Dean stated that the requirement for an interpretive center
was in the MOA. GSA and the NPS are proceeding with plans to develop an
interpretive center to interpret the African Burial Ground. An interpretive
center is within the scope and authority of GSA and Mr. Perry encouraged the
public to participate in the NPS’s listening sessions and meetings that will
shape the outcome of how the site will be interpreted by visitors. Members of
the community are welcome to pursue the concept of a memorial museum by
petitioning their elected representatives in government at the federal, stat and
city levels.
The Federal Steering Committee report recommended that a memorial be
commissioned to commemorate the heritage of all Africans in America, and, in
particular, those individuals buried at the African Burial Ground. The amended
MOA states that GSA, in consulation with the City and the NYC LPC, shall
determine an appropriate on-site memorial to commemorate the African Burial
Ground. GSA and the NPS are proceededing with plans to construct a memorial on
the African Burial Ground Memorial Site and members of the community are welcome
to participate in the meeting the NPS will be holding regarding the memorial.
The NPS, in outlining its role in the development of the exterior memorial and
interpretive center, stated that it would be looking to the community for help
in defining the significance of the site and telling the site’s story.
|
GSA Public Forums
Public Forum –
August 13, 2003
The public forum was held at Hunter College, and consisted of presentations by
Christopher Moore, Schomburg Center, regarding the history of enslaved Africans
in New York City. Mark Dremel, Project Manager, GSA, made a brief presentation
regarding the reburial of artifacts. Mr. Dremel made reference to and summarized
the previous discussions of the artifacts presented by Dr. Jean Howson and Dr.
Warren Perry regarding the types of artifacts recovered. Based on these
discussions and the archaeological research, all of the artifacts that were
found in direct association with each burial, such as buttons, beads, straight
pins, coins, coffin nails, and fragments of coffins, would be reburied with the
individual. The artifacts recovered as part of the fill on the site, primarily
fragments of the pottery produced at the potteries that had been in operation
along Broadway, would not be reburied with the individuals. Mr. Dremel’s
presentation was followed by an opportunity for the members of the audience to
ask questions of GSA, Mr. Moore or the moderator, Diane Dayson, NPS.
|
Appendix A
Timeline of Meetings and Telephone Conferences conducted by
the ABG Project Team
August
– October 2003
|
August 12
|
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg
Center/OPEI); New York City
|
August 13
|
Public Forum,
Hunter College; New York City |
August 26
|
Meeting between
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks
Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks Recreation and
Historic Preservation, the National Park Service, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and GSA; New York City.
Consulting Party Meeting sponsored by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation; Adam Clayton Powell Building, New York City
|
August 28
|
Meeting between Stephen Perry, Administrator, GSA
and
|
September 4
|
ABG Team
Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg Center/OPEI);
New York City
|
September 9
|
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg
Center/OPEI);
New York City
|
September 17
|
Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation,
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Preservation)
|
September 23
|
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg
Center/OPEI);
New York City
|
October 16
|
ABG Team Meeting/Conference call (GSA/Corps/NPS/Schomburg
Center/OPEI);
New York City
|
October 30
|
Meeting/Conference call with GSA, Corps, NPS,
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New York City Landmarks Preservation
Commission, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation, Schomburg Center, and Howard University; New York City
Meeting with GSA, Corps, NPS, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, New
York City Landmarks Preservation Commission and Community Representatives
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|